Is your team Adapting or Enduring?

Being adaptable is not the same as absorbing constant chaos.

Happy Thursday,

Most organisations are not rewarding adaptable teams. They are rewarding teams that tolerate chaos. There’s a difference. One sustains performance, the other kills it over time. The problem is the two often look the same in the short term. So let’s unpack this nuance, because understanding the difference matters if you want to lead change without burning people out in the process.

🧠 LEARN something.

That confusion shows up in how leaders define and reward adaptability. Most say they want people who can adjust to changing demands, solve novel problems, and stay effective under pressure. But in practice, what often gets recognised is something else entirely: endurance. The distinction is not just semantic, it is grounded in research on high performance. Adaptive performance is the ability to recalibrate behaviour and thinking in response to changing demands. Endurance is when people simply push through change and uncertainty without recalibration and recovery. Being adaptable is not the same as tolerating instability. It is not absorbing constant ambiguity, shifting priorities, poor planning, and unrealistic workloads without consequence. Endurance can look like adaptability in the short term, but over time it erodes cognitive capacity, decision quality, and engagement.

This is where the gap widens. Organisations create environments that demand constant adjustment but provide little to no stability to anchor it, or time to recalibrate. As priorities shift and success metrics move midstream, leaders then celebrate those who “handle it” as resilient and adaptive to change. In reality, they are often just absorbing dysfunction. A resilient team is not one that absorbs endless chaos. It is one that can recover from it, recalibrate, and move to the next thing. Teams that understand this are able to not only adapt, but drive performance through constant change.

🤔 REFLECT on an idea.

“Peak performance is not a sustainable state”

David Allen

Allen’s point is simple but often ignored. High performance happens in peaks and troughs. You can’t be “on” all the time if you’re never allowed to switch “off.” Leading teams and organisations through change works the same way, just at scale.

😊 SMILE a little.

Nothing says “we care about wellbeing” quite like launching a resilience workshop during everyone’s lunch break!

 DO IT to get results.

One of the simplest ideas in change leadership came from Kurt Lewin, who described change as a three-step process: unfreeze, change, refreeze. Most organisations are quick to unfreeze the current state and drive change, but then move straight onto the next initiative, creating an endless cycle of accumulated change. Refreezing is where many leaders fail. It’s the stage where the new way becomes stable, predictable, and repeatable. So before pushing for more adaptability, ask: what needs to refreeze? Call it out explicitly. Give people something solid to stand on and recalibrate around, so they can adapt to everything else more effectively.

🌱 How we can support you and your team.

We provide strategic leadership solutions tailored to align with your business strategy, size, and budget. We can support your with:

  • Leadership Coaching (Individual)

  • Team Coaching (Group and Leadership Teams)

  • Workshops, Offsites and Team Building

  • In-house End-to-End Leadership Program Design and Delivery

Kia pai tō wiki

Kenny Bhosale

CEO & Founder, The Bridge Leaders

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to Leadership Unplugged to continue reading.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Reply

or to participate.